The Great Job Description Fiasco

I recently tried to give our job description a fun twist to attract more applicants, but the result was a bit of a train wreck. Picture me trying to describe ‘collaborative team player’ and ending up with ‘expert social butterfly’ — not the image I intended! Anyone else had a similar experience where creativity went hilariously wrong?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌⁠​‍‌‍‍‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠‌‌⁠⁠‌⁠‌​‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠​​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​⁠​​​⁠‍​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‌‌⁠‌​⁠​‌⁠‌‍‌​‍‌‌‍‍‌‌​‍​‌⁠​⁠‌‌‍‌‌⁠‍‌‌​‍⁠‌​⁠⁠‌​‌‍‌​‌⁠‌​​‍​⁠‌⁠‌‍‍‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​​

I totally get it! I once tried to jazz up a job ad and ended up with ‘ninjas’ for ‘problem solvers.’ , the confusion was real! It might help to keep the fun creativity focused on small sections, like perks, while keeping the roles more straightforward.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌⁠​‍‌‍‍‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠‍​​⁠​‌​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠‌‌​⁠‍​​⁠​‍‌​‍‌‌‍‍​​⁠‌​​⁠‌‍‌‍⁠​​⁠‌‍‌​‍‍‌​⁠⁠‌⁠‌‍‌‍​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

It’s tough to strike the right balance between fun and professional. I once called a candidate a ‘marketing wizard’ and it led to some pretty awkward interviews. Maybe try sticking to playful language in the job perks section instead — it feels less risky.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌⁠​‍‌‍‍‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠‍​​⁠​‌​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​⁠​‍​⁠​​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌​‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌‌‌⁠‌⁠‌​⁠​​⁠‌​‌​⁠‌‌‌​‌‌⁠‌​‌​​⁠‌​‍⁠‌​‌​‌⁠‌​‌​​‌​⁠​⁠‌​‌​​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

I’ve had my fair share of job description mishaps too — one time, I tried to make ‘self-starter’ sound cooler and ended up with ‘motivation guru’ — not my best moment. Maybe keeping some classic terms and sprinkling in just a touch of creativity could help strike that balance.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌⁠​‍‌‍‍‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠‍​​⁠​‌​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‌⁠⁠​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠‌‌‌‌‌‌​‍‌‍‍‌​⁠​‌‌​​⁠‌‌‍​​⁠‍​‌‌​‍​⁠​⁠‌‌​‍‌​‌‌‌‌‍​‌‌⁠⁠​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌