2025-12-29 – Weekly Recruiting News : A quirky volunteer retention clue

Last week on the forum, discussions revolved around the evolving landscape of recruitment strategies, with a keen focus on inclusivity and diversity. Members shared insights on expanding sourcing efforts beyond traditional platforms like LinkedIn and explored innovative ways to build diverse talent pipelines. The community also delved into the challenges of reducing bias in hiring processes and discussed the effectiveness of various tools designed for this purpose. Moreover, there was an engaging dialogue about the impact of referrals on interview success rates.


This Week’s Hot Topics

A quirky predictor of volunteer retention
This thread uncovers an unusual indicator that might just help in understanding volunteer retention better. It’s sparking a lot of curiosity among members.

Read more here

Who invented the off-limits rule
Dive into the origins of the off-limits rule in recruiting. This discussion provides some historical context and its implications for modern practices.

Read more here

Accidentally sent Hi Job Title
We’ve all had our slip-ups. This light-hearted thread tackles the common mishap of sending incorrect job titles in emails and how to gracefully recover.

Read more here

Beyond LinkedIn: inclusive sourcing wins
Members share their successes and strategies in sourcing talent outside of LinkedIn, with a focus on inclusivity. It’s packed with practical tips.

Read more here

Beyond referrals: building diverse pipelines
This conversation challenges the reliance on referrals, offering alternate strategies to ensure a more diverse hiring pipeline.

Read more here

Referrals and interview odds
Explore how much referrals really impact the odds of landing an interview. Insights from recruiters shed light on this common practice.

Read more here

Tools that actually reduce bias
A critical examination of tools aimed at reducing bias in recruitment. Members weigh in on which ones truly make a difference.

Read more here

My go-to boolean for mapping SREs
For those focused on tech recruiting, this thread shares a tried-and-tested Boolean search for mapping Site Reliability Engineers effectively.

Read more here

Speed vs depth at career fairs
A thoughtful analysis of the trade-offs between quick interactions and deeper connections at career fairs. It’s a must-read for event recruiters.

Read more here

Turning job ads into stories
Discover how to transform standard job advertisements into compelling narratives that attract top talent. Some creative ideas are being shared here.

Read more here


Hope you find these discussions as engaging and informative as ever. Looking forward to seeing your contributions and insights in the coming week.

2 Likes

We filled two data roles last quarter by sourcing from https://techqueria.org/jobs and a local mutual-aid Slack, then running a 30-minute blind work sample scored against a rubric β€” β€˜structure beats gut feel.’ It wasn’t fast and we had to show up for those communities (sponsoring a meetup), but the shortlist was more diverse and the hires stuck, which feels more slow-cooker than microwave.

β€Œβ β€β β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ β€Œβ β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ β€‹β€‹β€Œβ€β β€‹β€Œβ β€β€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€Œβ€Œβ€β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€Œβ β€‹β β€Œβ€‹β€‹β β€Œβ β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ β€Œβ€β β β€Œβ β€β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€‹β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€Œβ β β€Œβ€β β€‹β€Œβ β€β€β€Œβ€‹β β β€Œβ β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€β€Œβ β€‹β β€Œβ€β€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β β€Œ

Quick example: we hired a stellar ops analyst from a nonprofit’s volunteer data team and an OSS meetup, skipping LinkedIn, then ran a paid $50, 20‑minute anonymized task β€” appreciate the rubric push, @Guide. Quirky bit: volunteers who stuck with weekly projects 4+ weeks were about 2x more likely to clear our 90‑day ramp, so I now source via https://www.catchafire.org/ and track consistency. Caveat: , setting up payments for micro‑tasks is slow, but the bias reduction is worth it.

β€Œβ β€β β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ β€Œβ β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ β€‹β€‹β€Œβ€β β€‹β€Œβ β€β€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€Œβ€Œβ€β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€Œβ β€‹β β€Œβ€‹β€‹β β€Œβ β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€Œβ€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€Œβ€β€‹β€Œβ€β€β€β€Œβ€‹β€β€Œβ€‹β β€‹β β€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€Œβ€‹β€Œβ€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€‹β€‹β€Œβ β€β€Œβ€Œβ€β€β β€Œβ€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€‹β β β€Œβ€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β β€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β β€Œ

, β€˜just source on LinkedIn’ drives me nuts β€” our best ops hire came via an OSS meetup, and we asked organizers for opt-in referrals of people who’d β€œshown up 6+ months” consistently. Building on @Guide, we run a 20-minute blind, rubric-scored task in Google Forms with a $40 stipend and two reviewers to cut bias. Small caveat: without a 2-minute role preview, volunteers sometimes misfire, so add that context before the task.

β€Œβ β€β β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ β€Œβ β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ β€‹β€‹β€Œβ€β β€‹β€Œβ β€β€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€Œβ€Œβ€β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€Œβ β€‹β β€Œβ€‹β€‹β β€Œβ β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€Œβ€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€β€‹β€Œβ€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β β€β€Œβ β€‹β€Œβ€Œβ€β β€β€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€Œβ€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β β€Œβ β€‹β β€Œβ€‹β€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€β€β€Œβ β€β€Œβ€‹β β€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β β€Œ

Building on @ryan85, I’ve had luck finding steady contributors via skills‑based volunteering like Taproot Plus (https://taprootplus.org) and asking project leads who showed up week‑after‑week β€” the folks who close the boring tickets are the ones who quietly restock the office fridge. Caveat: it skews toward people with spare cycles, so we balance with targeted outreach and travel stipends for evening community college events β€” anyone tried a similar tweak?

β€Œβ β€β β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ β€Œβ β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ β€‹β€‹β€Œβ€β β€‹β€Œβ β€β€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€Œβ€Œβ€β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€Œβ β€‹β β€Œβ€‹β€‹β β€Œβ β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€Œβ€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€β€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€Œβ€β€‹β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€Œβ€‹β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€‹β β€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€β€Œβ€β€β€Œβ€‹β β€Œβ€‹β€‹β β€β€Œβ€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€β€β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β β€‹β β€‹β β€Œβ€‹β€Œβ€‹β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β β€Œ

Saw retention jump when we gave volunteers a clear β€œfinish line” β€” a 1‑week scoped project on Catchafire (https://www.catchafire.org) led to two steady hires without touching LinkedIn. Caveat: that setup favors weekend availability, so we run a midweek two‑evening version to keep it inclusive.

β€Œβ β€β β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ β€Œβ β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ β€‹β€‹β€Œβ€β β€‹β€Œβ β€β€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€Œβ€Œβ€β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€Œβ β€‹β β€Œβ€‹β€‹β β€Œβ β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€Œβ€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€‹β€Œβ€β€Œβ β€β€β€Œβ β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€‹β β€Œβ€β β€β€‹β β€Œβ€‹β€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ β€‹β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€Œβ€Œβ€β€β€‹β β€‹β€β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ β β€Œβ€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β β€Œ

Quick win for us: pairing each new volunteer with a Slack buddy and scheduling a short end-of-week demo (β€œshow the rough draft, not perfection”) doubled retention and surfaced quiet blockers early; small caveat β€” without a crisp ticket with acceptance criteria, it backfires. @chris77 have you tried a buddy handoff?

β€Œβ β€β β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ β€Œβ β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€Œβ€Œβ β€‹β€‹β€Œβ€β β€‹β€Œβ β€β€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€Œβ€Œβ€β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€Œβ β€‹β β€Œβ€‹β€‹β β€Œβ β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€‹β€β€‹β β€Œβ€β€‹β β€‹β€‹β€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€‹β β€β€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€‹β€‹β€β€‹β€β€‹β β€β€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ€‹β€‹β€β€Œβ€β€β€‹β€Œβ€‹β€β€‹β€Œβ β€Œβ β€Œβ€β€‹β€β€‹β β€‹β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€β€β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β β€Œβ€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ β€‹β€β€Œβ β€‹β β€Œβ€Œβ€β€β€Œβ€β€β€β€Œβ β€β€‹β€Œβ€Œβ€‹β€‹β€‹β β€Œβ€β€‹β€β€‹β€β€Œβ β β€Œ